Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. v. Jazz Photo Corp. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even if the undisclosed prior art references were material, the court could not infer an “intent [to deceive] solely from an inference derived from citations used in some patent prosecutions, but not other patent prosecutions.”
• dismissing claims for inequitable conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).