Fuhrmann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if matters raised in an untimely postconviction application were not raised due to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel or failure to preserve error at trial, ineffective assistance could also have been raised within the time limitation
• stating “the right to appointed counsel for a convicted criminal extends only to the first appeal of right”
• finding the trial court did not commit reversible error by failing to appoint counsel and dismissing applicant’s request for postconviction relief when the application was facially barred by the three-year statute of limitations in Iowa Code section 822.3
• \[W]e detect no state or federal constitutional grounds for counsel in such a proceeding.\
• “[W]e detect no state or federal constitutional grounds for counsel in such a proceeding.”
• if matters raised in untimely postconviction application were not raised due to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel or failure to preserve error at trial, ineffective assistance could also have been raised within the time limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).