Fuezell Burks v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the relationship as an “apples-to-oranges comparison,” and noting that it requires courts to undertake an additional analysis of whether defense counsel’s billings were reasonable
• describing the relationship as an “apples-to-oranges comparison,” and noting that it requires courts to undertake an additional analysis of whether defendant’s counsel billed a reasonable amount
• affirming 25% reduction in part because party achieved marginal success in the suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).