· 11/19/1954
Fudge v. Physicians Insurance
Citations
- 125 F. Supp. 653
- 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “[i]t is simply not reasonable to require parties in every case to pay the same amount regardless of the actual ‘services rendered’ or ‘time spent complying with the requested discovery.’”
- holding “[i]t is simply not reasonable to require parties in every case to pay the same amount regardless of the actual ‘services rendered’ or ‘time spent complying with the requested discovery.’”
- holding “[i]t is simply not reasonable to require parties in every case to pay the same amount regardless of the actual ‘services rendered’ or ‘time spent complying with the requested discovery.’”
- holding “[i]t is simply not reasonable to require parties in every case to pay the same amount regardless of the actual ‘services rendered’ or ‘time spent complying with the requested discovery.’”
- holding “[i]t is simply not reasonable to require parties in every case to pay the same amount regardless of the actual ‘services rendered’ or ‘time spent complying with the requested discovery.’”
- holding “[i]t is simply not reasonable to require parties in every case to pay the same amount regardless of the actual ‘services rendered’ or ‘time spent complying with the requested discovery.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wyche
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.