FTC v. Qualcomm Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that cell phone extraction reports did “not require any human input short of plugging the phone into a machine” and because the reports were “automatically generated” they were not “statements” made by a “declarant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).