Frykman v. University of Minnesota-Duluth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to resolve a case as a matter of law because the facts did not establish “a clear-cut storm incident”
• affirming a jury verdict finding defendant negligent for not clearing its property of snow and ice that caused plaintiff to slip and fall
• upholding the district court’s refusal to apply the Mattson rule when “[t]he evidence permitted a finding that the weather incident or event [producing measurable and later trace amounts of freezing rain] had lapsed [at the time of Frykman’s fall]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).