Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a mutual agreement to arbitrate satisfies the requirement for consideration
• analyzing terms of employee’s dispute resolution program and noting no “corollary provisions” applied to employer
• noting in the context of arbitration that a provision can lack mutuality and thus be unenforceable
• finding no consideration where the agreement “does not alter the fundamental component of the at-will employment relationship—the ability to quit or be fired at anytime for any reason.”
• finding no consideration where the agreement “does not alter the fundamental component of the at-will employment relar tionship — the ability to quit or be fired at anytime for any reason.”
• finding no consideration where the agreement “does not alter the fundamental component of the at-will employment relationship— the ability to quit or be fired at any time for any reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).