District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/23/1980
Frye v. Frye
Citations
- 385 So. 2d 1383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- unless the parties specifically agree, rehabilitative alimony does not necessarily terminate on the remarriage of the recipient
- court held that mere fact of remarriage without anything more is not enough to terminate rehabilitative alimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Markham v. MarkhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-20· cited 17×
- Bentzoni v. BentzoniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-20· cited 16×
- Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-10-07· cited 16×
- Lee v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-09· cited 13×
- Kissinger v. MasonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-30· cited 12×
- English v. GalbreathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-30· cited 9×
- Stanford v. StanfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-03-20· cited 7×
- Keister v. KeisterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-17· cited 7×
- Maas v. MaasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-19· cited 5×
- Faircloth v. FairclothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-04· cited 4×
- Karch v. HoffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-13· cited 3×
- Owens v. OwensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-03· cited 2×
- McCartney v. McCartneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-07· cited 2×
- Vaccato v. PustizziDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-11· cited 1×
- Winkles v. WinklesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-31
- Knopik v. KnopikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-07
- Kussrath v. KussrathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-23
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Underwood v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-04-10· cited 127×
- Cann v. CannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 61×
- Lee v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-03-05· cited 54×
- Reback v. RebackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-05-07· cited 53×
- Fort v. FortSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-31· cited 38×
- Mertz v. MertzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-09-28· cited 36×
- Carlton v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-08-01· cited 36×
- Chaachou v. ChaachouSupreme Court of Florida· 1961-11-29· cited 26×
- Friedman v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-05-15· cited 23×
- Murray v. MurrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-08-15· cited 21×
- Kennedy v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida· 1974-11-20· cited 20×
- In Re Estate of FreelandSupreme Court of Florida· 1965-10-13· cited 19×
- Carlton v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-05-10· cited 19×
- Ohmes v. OhmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-06-28· cited 16×
- Blackmon v. BlackmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-31· cited 14×
- Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-11-23· cited 13×
- Jassy v. JassyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-07-01· cited 11×
- Richter v. RichterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-03-25· cited 10×
- McRee v. McReeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-08-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.