D. Massachusetts· 9/19/2000
Fryar v. Bissonnette
Citations
- 113 F. Supp. 2d 175
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13906
- 2000 WL 1370952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- petitioner had no right to an evidentiary hearing under Townsend “because the facts underlying his claim of error were fully developed in the state proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ponsor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 1,620×
- Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 1,094×
- Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-01-09· cited 175×
- Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1973-11-01· cited 163×
- Arthur Donnell Miller, Jr. v. Ron ChampionTenth Circuit· 1998-11-24· cited 129×
- Kevin Dewayne Cardwell v. Fred W. Greene, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional CenterFourth Circuit· 1998-08-11· cited 111×
- Amanullah v. NelsonFirst Circuit· 1987-02-04· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. FryarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-04-07· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. FryarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-06-13· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-09· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-01-14· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. GallowayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-03-02· cited 29×
- Edwards v. MurphyD. Massachusetts· 2000-04-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.