Fry v. Fry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the ultimate responsibility that a proper divorce decree is entered, and for entry of a QDRO if the court determines the situation so requires, rests upon the trial court
• holding the ultimate responsibility that a proper divorce decree is entered, and for entry of a QDRO if the court determines the situation so requires, rests upon the trial court
• QDRO is, generally speaking, simply enforcement device of decree of dissolution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Klimek v. Klimek
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2009-10-27· cited 69×
• Blomdahl v. Blomdahl
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-04-13· cited 11×
• Thompson v. Thompson
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2010-05-11· cited 7×
• Thompson v. Thompson
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2010-07-06· cited 3×
• Hall v. Hall
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2010-05-11

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strunk v. Chromy-Strunk
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 209×
• State v. Hausmann
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-05-22· cited 201×
• Blaine v. Blaine
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-02-15· cited 97×
• Jensen v. Jensen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-06-13· cited 88×
• Klimek v. Klimek
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2009-10-27· cited 69×
• Bowers v. Lens
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-07-26· cited 67×
• Welch v. Welch
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-07-22· cited 45×
• Schwartz v. Schwartz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-04-18· cited 30×
• Cumming v. Cumming
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-04-24· cited 18×
• Kullbom v. Kullbom
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-08-12· cited 6×