Fry v. Fry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the absence of a stipulation by the parties, a successor judge may not enter a judgment when factual matters were tried before a predecessor judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kirt v. Sharper
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-03
• K.B. v. Department of Children & Family Services & Guardian Ad Litem Program
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bradford v. FOUNDATION & MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-02-02· cited 27×
• Tompkins Land and Housing, Inc. v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-11· cited 14×
• Paragon Group, Inc. v. Hoeksema
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-09-18· cited 11×
• Alvord v. Alvord
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-09· cited 7×
• Reaves v. REAVES, JR.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-07· cited 6×
• Dash v. Dash
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-31· cited 4×
• Umscheid v. Umscheid
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-05· cited 4×
• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-27· cited 4×
• S.C. v. Department of Children & Family Services
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-02· cited 2×
• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-30· cited 1×