Fry v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 82 Va. 334
- 1886 Va. LEXIS 38
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Proceedings—Felony cases—Juries.—Hall’s Case, 80 Va. 555; Richards, Fauver and Fry’s Cases, 81 Va. 110; Honesty’s Case, 81 Va. 283, and Cluverius’ Case, 81 Va. 787, approved as to mode of selecting juries.</p> <p>2. Idem— Cross- exam ination of prosecutrix—Previous unchaste character. It is not allowable on cross-examination to ask prosecutrix at the trial of an indictment for rape if she had not been before a person of unchaste character.</p> <p>3. Idem—Jury— Verdict—Amendment.—At trial of an indictment for a felony it is proper to allow the jury to retire and amend their verdict.</p> <p>4. Idem — Record.— Whether the record says: “The same jury, adjourned over on yesterday, came into court,” &e., or “The same jury sivorn in this case and adjourned over yesterday, came into court,” &c., it is immaterial.</p> <p>5. Idem—Case at bar.—Here the evidence clearly warrants the jury in finding the prisoner guilty of the felony wherewith he is charged in the indictment.</p>
Judges: Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court· 1901-07-01· cited 52×
- State v. ApleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1913-04-14· cited 20×
- Wynne v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1975-10-10· cited 19×
- Burnley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1967-12-04· cited 15×
- Fry v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1935-01-17· cited 4×
- Claiborne v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1795-10-15
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.