Skip to main content
· 2/5/1991

Fry Communications, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 22 Cl. Ct. 497
  • 1991 WL 14092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an ALJ’s RFC finding and subsequent 23 hypothetical to the VE were complete because the ALJ properly discounted medical expert 24 testimony
  • affirming dismissal of a complaint where the district court 23 was “literally guessing as to what facts support the legal claims being asserted against certain 24 defendants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.