Frumkin v. JA Jones, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the provision “focuses on the disregard of a known or obvious time or place restriction—like calling someone at midnight.”
• “Nothing compels a consumer to list his cell phone number with his counterparty when he opens an account, or to open an account at all, but if that is the number he chooses to provide, then he cannot complain about being called at that number.”
• \[T]he authorities are almost unanimous that voluntarily furnishing a cellphone number to a vendor ... constitutes express consent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).