Frulla v. CRA Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff's unreasonable interpretation did not establish that there was an ambiguity in the contract
• “A case is moot when it no longer presents a live controversy with respect to which the court can give meaningful relief.” (quotation omitted)
• “[A]lthough neither party challenges our jurisdiction, we are obli- gated to address jurisdictional questions sua sponte.”
• “[W]e are obligated to address juris- dictional questions sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).