Frost v. Surface

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that immigration plaintiffs 16 needed to allege a pattern or policy that caused unreasonable delay to satisfy the same 17 transaction or occurrence test
• holding that if joined plaintiffs fail to meet requirements of Rule 20(a), “the district 4 - ORDER court may sever the misjoined plaintiffs, as long as no substantial right will be prejudiced by the severance”
• explaining that the “same transaction” requirement requires more than general allegations to create a common transaction or occurrence
• finding that general allegations of delayed adjudication do not establish a common transaction or occurrence
• finding that general allegations of delayed adjudication do not establish a common transaction or occurrence
• explaining that a court may not drop a party if a substantial right of the parties 20 would be prejudiced by the severance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).