Frost v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indictment found sufficient even though it alleged unlawful receipt of check rather than unlawful taking of check
• indictment alleging unlawful receipt of a check rather than unlawful taking of a check withstood challenge; indictment need not quote literally the exact language of the statute allegedly violated
• Proof that a check written to another company was deposited in the account of appellant’s company was sufficient to support the jury’s determination that appellant had committed theft by taking.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-02-16· cited 18×
• Gentry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-07-27· cited 9×
• Striplin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-08· cited 5×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-08-30· cited 3×
• Green v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-09-21

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-03-08· cited 57×
• Bostic v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-02-15· cited 18×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-11-14· cited 14×
• Bullard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-01· cited 12×
• Kelly v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-06-13· cited 10×
• Jordan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-01· cited 9×
• Duke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-01-29· cited 9×
• Mullen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-21· cited 4×
• Travis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-24· cited 1×