Frost v. Robave, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the statute does not provide three separate categories of liability, namely, care, custody, and knowing permission; instead, they are examples of keeper or harborer or “at the least, usually would be encompassed within the term ‘keeping’ or ‘harboring’ ”
• the Animal Control Act “applies to legal owners as well as anyone who keeps or harbors a dog”
• the Animal Control Act \applies to legal owners as well as anyone who keeps or harbors a dog.\
• Illinois courts have consistently held that a person’s status as keeper is dependent upon control over the animal at the time of the injury
• a keeper is one who “had control over the animal at the time of the injury or immediately prior to the injury” and a harborer is one who provided food and shelter on a semi-permanent nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).