Frost v. Regions Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendants’ argument that the bank had failed to address their affirmative defense of lack of notice was sufficient to counter the bank’s motion for summary judgment, despite the failure of the defendants to file any papers or affidavits in opposition
• “Because the bank did not meet its burden to refute the Frosts’ lack of notice and opportunity to cure defense, the bank is not entitled to final final summary judgment of foreclosure.”
• “Although the bank argues that the defense did not refer to any language from the mortgage, the bank cites no authority which requires the defense to contain such a reference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).