Frost v. Household Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the parties satisfied “only a few” requirements of the opt-out notice in filing their suit, the opt-out had been insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• McAdams v. Mercedes-Benz, USA, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-16· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. Coyne
  Second Circuit· 1983-01-26· cited 443×
• Terri L. Hamad v. Woodcrest Condominium Association
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-04-22· cited 185×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,779 in Re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. State of Ohio
  Tenth Circuit· 1974-11-25· cited 101×
• Muncie Power Products, Inc. v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-05-15· cited 95×
• McCubbrey v. Boise Cascade Home & Land Corp.
  N.D. California· 1976-03-29· cited 32×
• Bonner v. Texas City Independent School Dist. of Texas
  S.D. Texas· 1969-09-02· cited 31×