Froom v. Perel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring expert testimony regarding \complex real estate acquisition and development\ because \jurors could not be expected to know . . . whether sophisticated investors would be willing to invest\ in a project
• \Expert testimony is required when the issue is beyond the 'common knowledge of lay persons.'\ (quoting Kelly v. Berlin, 300 N.J. Super. 256, 265-66 (App. A-0880-19 10 Div. 1997)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).