Frooks v. Clurman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming rule that “an indictment is good despite the absence of certain grand jurors on various days when testimony is heard, so long as ‘at least twelve of the Grand Jurors, who voted_ to indict, heard all essential and critical evidence’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).