Frontier Saloon, Inc. v. Short

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand for explicit findings was not necessary where it was “readily apparent that the trial court accepted” one party’s testimony and rejected the other party’s
• holding that remand for explicit findings was not necessary where it was “readily apparent that the trial court accepted” one party’s testimony and rejected the other party’s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).