Skip to main content
· 6/9/1956

Froelich v. United Royalty Co.

Citations

  • 297 P.2d 1106
  • 179 Kan. 652
  • 6 Oil & Gas Rep. 294
  • 1956 Kan. LEXIS 283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • conveyance of oil and gas royalty (personal property) in the chain of title contained refer-enees inconsistent with the seller reserving rights in unsevered minerals (real property
  • function of a court is to enforce a contract made by the parties, not to create a contract for them which is in accord with the court’s own notions as to what the contracting parties wisely should have done

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.