Frobes v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding where the “ALJ referenced emergency room visits and inpatient hospitalizations without explaining why those forms of treatment would be necessary for Claimant’s impairments”
• criticizing the ALJ’s reference of the lack of “inpatient hospitalizations without explaining why those forms of treatment would be necessary”
• “If the ALJ concludes that the treating physician's opinion is inconsistent with other evidence, she must explain the inconsistency.”
• “If the ALJ concludes that the treating physician's opinion is inconsistent with other evidence, she must explain the inconsistency.”
• “If the ALJ concludes that the treating physician’s opinion is inconsistent with other evidence, she must explain the inconsistency.”
• if an ALJ discounts a treating physician’s opinion as inconsistent with the evidence, “she must explain the inconsistency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).