Skip to main content
· 3/9/1994

Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla Coates

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 752
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 3128
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1743
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4103
  • 1994 WL 68422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an organization was not a “public accommodation” within the meaning of 22 the statute as it was not connected to an actual place
  • affirming dismissal of Title II public accommodation discrimination claim against a national non-profit organization where the plaintiff did not “allege facts from which it could be concluded that [the defendant] is closely connected to a ‘place’ or ‘facility’”
  • “All allegations 25 of material fact in the complaint are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable 26 to the nonmoving party.”
  • twice using the phrase “closely connected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sneed, Thompson, Rymer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.