Skip to main content
· 12/7/1974

Fritzson v. City of Manhattan

Citations

  • 528 P.2d 1193
  • 215 Kan. 810
  • 1974 Kan. LEXIS 575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a] majority of the courts have held a wife’s action for loss of her husband’s consortium is barred by the exclusive remedy provision of. the applicable Workmen’s Compensation Law”
  • holding loss-of-consortium claim barred by exclusivity provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fatzer, Fontron, Owsley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.