· 12/7/1974
Fritzson v. City of Manhattan
Citations
- 528 P.2d 1193
- 215 Kan. 810
- 1974 Kan. LEXIS 575
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[a] majority of the courts have held a wife’s action for loss of her husband’s consortium is barred by the exclusive remedy provision of. the applicable Workmen’s Compensation Law”
- holding loss-of-consortium claim barred by exclusivity provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fatzer, Fontron, Owsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.