Fritz v. State
Citations
- 80 Kan. 168
- 101 P. 1013
- 1909 Kan. LEXIS 39
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Constitutional Law — Equal Protection of the Law — Attorney’s Fee — Abatement of Liquor Nuisance. The statute providing for the abatement of a nuisance maintained in violation of the prohibitory liquor law, which authorizes the court in awarding judgment in favor of the plaintiff to allow and tax as costs an attorney’s fee for plaintiff’s attorney (Laws 1903, ch. 338), is not repugnant to the guaranty of the equal protection of the law made by the federal constitution.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court· 1899-04-17· cited 271×
- Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court· 1902-12-08· cited 119×
- Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. DobneySupreme Court· 1903-04-06· cited 54×
- British America Assurance Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Kansas· 1898-12-10· cited 26×
- In re EllisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-07-05· cited 9×
- State v. PlamondonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1907-02-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.