Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/11/1997
Fritz v. State
Citations
- 946 S.W.2d 844
- 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48
- 1997 WL 309995
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discriminatory intent inherent in reason for peremptory challenge that males under the age of thirty would identify with opponent
- discriminatory intent inherent in reason for peremptory challenge that males under the age of thirty would identify with opponent
- discriminatory intent inherent in reason for peremptory challenge that males under the age of thirty would identify with opponent
- discriminatory intent inherent in reason for peremptory challenge that males under the age of thirty would identify with opponent
- discriminatory intent inherent in reason for peremptory challenge that males under the age of thirty would identify with opponent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baird, Meyers, Mansfield, Womack, Keller, Holland, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-22· cited 169×
- Guzman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-05-04· cited 20×
- Garza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2000-01-06· cited 18×
- Sparks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2001-06-13· cited 16×
- Moeller v. BlancTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-02-18· cited 15×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-09-20· cited 12×
- Gibson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-10-06· cited 10×
- Gray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-03-18· cited 8×
- McKenna v. W & W SERVICES, INC.Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2009-10-12· cited 2×
- George Washington Hicks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-07-21
- Goldberg, Dror Haim v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-22
- Dinario Jones v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-12-31
- Nancy McKenna v. W & W Services, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2009-11-12
- Walter Charles Gibson, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-10-06
- Walter Charles Gibson, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-08-05
- Barry Jerome Hysaw v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-03-11
- Robert Gray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-02-12
- Donnie Conyers v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-05-25
- Kelly Laura Sixtos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-08-26
- Hicks, George WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-08-17
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,420×
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,403×
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 1,327×
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,235×
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-12-09· cited 512×
- Hoyt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1961-11-20· cited 340×
- Whitsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-09-19· cited 278×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-27· cited 265×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 229×
- United States v. Michael L. JohnsonTenth Circuit· 1991-08-15· cited 123×
- Casarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-12-13· cited 112×
- Jones v. RyanThird Circuit· 1993-03-05· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.