Skip to main content
· 8/20/1980

Fritz v. Norflor Const. Co.

Citations

  • 386 So. 2d 899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an engineering firm was an `agency' under s. 119.011 (2) insofar as it performed services for a city as city engineer
  • engineering firm was an \agent\ within the meaning of the Public Records Act where it acted as the city's water engineer
  • engineering corporation performing services for the city as city engineer relating to the water treatment plant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.