· 8/20/1980
Fritz v. Norflor Const. Co.
Citations
- 386 So. 2d 899
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an engineering firm was an `agency' under s. 119.011 (2) insofar as it performed services for a city as city engineer
- engineering firm was an \agent\ within the meaning of the Public Records Act where it acted as the city's water engineer
- engineering corporation performing services for the city as city engineer relating to the water treatment plant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.