Fritz v. Marantette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not entitled to summary disposition because there was a jury-submissible question of fact whether the underlying debt was liquidated and whether the amount offered in settlement was only that which both parties conceded was due
• potential to substantially increase litigation
• potential to substantially increase litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).