Skip to main content
· 4/16/1998

Fritz v. City of Kingman

Citations

  • 957 P.2d 337
  • 191 Ariz. 432
  • 267 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1998 Ariz. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the city's general plan \clearly contemplated that future decisions such as imposing specific uses on specific locations would merely adhere to the Plan because the Plan itself does not descend to or mandate such specificity\
  • noting that the city's general plan \clearly contemplated that future decisions such as imposing specific uses on specific locations would merely adhere to the Plan because the Plan itself does not descend to or mandate such specificity\
  • reviewing de novo the trial court's determination that an ordinance was a legislative act subject to referendum
  • reviewing de novo the trial court's determination that an ordinance was a legislative act subject to referendum
  • reiterating that rezoning decisions are legislative
  • requiring legislative acts to be definite and specific

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zlaket, Jones, Feldman, Martone, McGregor, Ariz, Const, Gerber, Arizona

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.