Skip to main content
· 7/1/1901

Frith v. Pearce

Citations

  • 105 La. 186

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>In case a nuncupative testament by public act is held good as a nuncupative ' testament under private signature in other respects, the notary signing the act, and the person who signs the name of the testatrix on account of her physical disability, are competent witnesses, and may be counted as such.</p> <p>It appearing from the recitals of such an instrument, that the testatrix “was not able to sign her name on account of physical disability,” the requirements of K. C. C. 1582 will be complied with.</p> <p>On Rehearing.</p> <p>If a plaintiff, desiring to take an appeal from the judgment rendered on his peti tion, obtains an order for a “general appeal,” and perfects the same by executing a bond in favor of the clerk of court, the appeal brings up the entire judgment.</p> <p>The appellant cannot limit the scope of the appeal by a mere recital in the “condition” of the bond, that it is taken from particular parts of the judgment. If such was appellant’s intention he should have made the same known in the application for appeal and caused the order of appeal to be made accordingly.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “USCIS articulated a rational and ample basis for its decision” when the employer failed to demonstrate that it had, in the past, required relevant employees to have certain degrees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Been, Bench, Nicholes, Nicholls, Provosty, Seat, Takes, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.