Frisella v. Deuster Electric, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no misconduct where employee was slow with work, did not understand assigned tasks, and no evidence employee intentionally committed errors
• “whether an employer has solid grounds to terminate an employee is not the same issue as whether the former employee qualifies for compensation”
• two violations of employer’s policy was not misconduct without a showing of willfulness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).