Skip to main content
· 1/7/1999

Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. Dombeck

Citations

  • 164 F.3d 1115
  • 1999 WL 3942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that general statements merely cataloging environmental facts are legally inadequate where relevant standard requires quantified or detailed information
  • stating that the \particular provisions relied on by the [plaintiffs] indicate that the social and economic effects of proposed agency action -8- must also be considered once it is determined that the proposed agency action significantly affects the physical environment\
  • “Even assuming the data was flawed in some respects, this one study was not the only source of information used by the Forest Service in compiling the Final EIS.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.