Friends of Rockland Shelter Animals, Inc. v. Mullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the “Sham exception” did not apply because the plaintiffs interference claim was premised on ;the contention that the defendants acted in order to help [plaintiffs competitor to] remain in business, and not, solely to' damage the plaintiff
• “Fraudulent acts are not protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine when they occur in the adjudicatory process or where false information is filed with an administrative agency with deceptive intent.”
• “Fraudulent acts are not protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine when they occur in the adjudicatory process or where false information is filed with an administrative agency with deceptive intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).