Friends of Marolt Park v. United States Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a supplemental EIS is not required if “the relevant environmental impacts have already been considered” during the NEPA process
• holding that an agency “was not required to select the preferred option indicated in the final [environmental impact statement]” when the record showed that public support for the non-preferred alternative was higher
• requiring that ^n agency’s record of decision explain inconsistencies with the findings in its environmental impact statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).