Friends of Canyon Lake, Inc. v. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that arguments that agency did not provide required notice and information during application process were insufficient to invoke exception
• concluding that allegations that agency failed to provide required notice and information as part of application process were insufficient to invoke exception
• concluding that arguments that agency did not provide required notice and inf'ormation during application process were insufficient to invoke exception
• holding that trial court “had no choice but to grant the pleas to the jurisdiction, as a trial court ‘is generally without jurisdiction if the plaintiff fails to exhaust . . . administrative remedies’”
• noting that the 18 APA “does not confer jurisdiction upon a court to determine whether an administrative agency has complied with the administrative code”
• noting that “whether the agencies correctly complied with all of the intricacies of the application process cannot be the factor that confers jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).