· 11/20/2009
Friends of Animals v. Salazar
Citations
- 670 F. Supp. 2d 7
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108868
- 2009 WL 3953578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying catalyst theory where court dismissed plaintiff’s substantive claims where the issues were moot because the government already acted on the relief sought
- allowing a plaintiff “leave to amend its Complaint after commencing an action without proper notice would undermine the statute and render the notice requirement meaningless”
- rejecting plaintiffs’ request to cure defect by amendment of complaint and dismissing claim
- “failure to provide sixty-day notice prior to bringing its claim” requires dismissal
- dismissing claim for failing to 6 provide 60-day notice
- dismissing claim for failing to provide 60-day notice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.