Skip to main content
· 11/20/2009

Friends of Animals v. Salazar

Citations

  • 670 F. Supp. 2d 7
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108868
  • 2009 WL 3953578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying catalyst theory where court dismissed plaintiff’s substantive claims where the issues were moot because the government already acted on the relief sought
  • allowing a plaintiff “leave to amend its Complaint after commencing an action without proper notice would undermine the statute and render the notice requirement meaningless”
  • rejecting plaintiffs’ request to cure defect by amendment of complaint and dismissing claim
  • “failure to provide sixty-day notice prior to bringing its claim” requires dismissal
  • dismissing claim for failing to 6 provide 60-day notice
  • dismissing claim for failing to provide 60-day notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.