Friend v. Valley View Community Unit School District 365U

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in disregarding parts of non-movant’s statement of additional facts not supported by citations to the record
• holding brief violated Rule 28(a) where the plaintiff “does not inform us why the district court erred”
• holding a statement of additional facts “deficient” because plaintiff “failed to cite or submit evidence in support of nearly all of the additional facts he asserted”
• finding that the district court correctly deemed facts admitted when the non- movant “did not provide any citation to appropriate record evidence in support of his denial”
• affirming district court decision to deem facts admitted where denials were not appropriately supported with citation to the record
• disregarding facts contained in non-moving party’s statement of additional facts that were not supported by proper citations to the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).