Friend v. Time Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert testimony about a malfunctioning lift device met Daubert standard where expert had specialized knowledge of \similar devices\
• “An expert’s testimony may 25 be excluded where it is based on subjective beliefs or unsupported speculation which is no 26 more than unreliable ipse dixit guesswork.”
• “The jury 24 is entitled to hear expert testimony and decide whether to accept or reject it after 25 considering whether predicate facts on which the expert relied were accurate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).