Friehe v. Schaad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not a violation of equal protection to require a father to file with the putative father registry within five days of his child's birth or lose the right to object to an adoption
• holding that it was not a violation of equal protection to require a father to file with the putative father registry within five days of his child‘s birth or lose the right to object to an adoption
• holding that it was not a violation of equal protection to require a father to file with the putative father registry within five days of his child‘s birth or lose the right to object to an adoption
• holding that it was not a violation of equal protection to require a father to file with the putative father registry within five days of his child‘s birth or lose the right to object to an adoption
• interpreting In re Application of S.R.S. and M.B.S. as upholding the facial constitutionality of adoption statutes
• rejecting a father's due process claim where he relied on the mother's promise not to relinquish the child because \{hJis own failure to act upon the notice given to him deprived him of the opportunity to be heard\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).