Friedrich v. Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the seawall in Levy was used by the public as a thoroughfare, which purpose had been “provided by the State”
• occupier of land has duty to warn persons coming on to land of known dangers not known by nor obvious to the latter
• plaintiff, who fell off a pier and was injured while attempting to step around a water puddle on a pier, cannot recover because he chose narrow more dangerous path near edge of pier instead of a twenty foot wide path on other side of puddle
• superseded, in non-relevant part, by statute
• superseded, in non-relevant part, by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).