Friedman v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff failed to establish a Fourth Amendment violation because “[a]ssuming [the defendant’s] pat-down included touching Friedman’s genitalia while conducting the search, such conduct is not unreasonable in the absence of any showing of excessive force.”
• finding that the FTCA provides a sufficient post-deprivation remedy, thereby precluding a Fifth Amendment procedural due process claim
• finding that the FTCA provides a sufficient post-deprivation remedy, thereby precluding a Fifth Amendment procedural due process claim
• dismissing Fourth Amendment claim because even “[a]ssuming [officer’s] pat-down included touching [the plaintiff’s] genitalia while conducting the search, such conduct is not unreasonable in the absence of any showing of excessive force”
• \the line between a pat down and a fondle is too insubstantial to support the burden of supporting a claim for constitutional tort\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).