Skip to main content
· 11/13/1956

Friedman v. Tappan Development Corp.

Citations

  • 126 A.2d 646
  • 22 N.J. 523
  • 1956 N.J. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the meaning of a contract's terms is determined by looking to \the objective manifestations of the parties' intent\
  • stating \[i]t is not the real intent but the intent expressed or apparent in the writing that controls\
  • defining promissory estoppel as “a doctrine which employs equitable principles to satisfy the requirement that consideration must be given in exchange for the promise sought to be enforced”
  • “It is not the real intent, but the intent expressed or apparent in the writing that controls”
  • discussing requirement that contract promise be definite

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.