Skip to main content
· 3/19/2012

Friedman v. P+P, LLC (In Re Friedman)

Citations

  • 466 B.R. 471
  • 2012 WL 911545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “specific mission” of the absolute priority rule historically was to “undermine corporate shareholders’ advantages over unsecured creditors”
  • discussing the bankruptcy court’s determination — in an unpublished February 17, 2011 order — that the APR applies to individual Chapter 11 debtors
  • discussing the bankruptcy court’s determination — in an unpublished February 17, 2011 order — that the absolute priority rule applies to individual Chapter 11 debtors
  • explaining and providing sources to support the proposition that “including” is not a word of limitation
  • “The absolute priority rule’s origins lie in the intersection between fraudulent transfer law and the rise of the railroad during the nineteenth century.”
  • plain language reads in support of the broad view

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jury, Kirscher, Clarkson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.