Friedman v. Kennedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A well settled principle of the law of rescission is that one may not rescind in part and affirm in part; rescission must be in toto.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sununu v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC.
  District of Columbia· 2011-06-20· cited 16×
• Brown v. Hornstein
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-01-04· cited 11×
• Simmons v. Brooks
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1949-05-19· cited 5×
• Amalgamated Transit Union v. Hinton
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-22· cited 3×
• Sununu v. Philippine Airlines
  District of Columbia· 2011-06-20

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hecht Co. v. Bowles
  Supreme Court· 1944-02-28· cited 1,232×
• Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Lilienfeld's Estate
  Fourth Circuit· 1943-01-02· cited 41×
• Title & Trust Co. v. Durkheimer Investment Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1936-12-09· cited 23×
• Reed v. McLaws
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1941-02-10· cited 15×
• Moore v. Coates
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1944-11-22· cited 13×
• Myers v. H. L. Rust Co.
  District of Columbia· 1943-02-08· cited 10×
• New York Central Railroad v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1922-06-02· cited 8×
• Westchester Apartments, Inc. v. Keroes
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1943-07-13· cited 5×
• Singer v. Friedman
  D.C. Circuit· 1936-07-06· cited 5×
• McLeod v. McEachern
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1914-06-09· cited 5×
• Ciletti v. Acierno
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1909-01-08· cited 2×

Other cases named Friedman v. Kennedy

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Friedman v. Kennedy
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1971-06-04· cited 4×