Friedman v. Isoldi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting items seized pursuant to valid portions of warrant, other portions of which were insufficiently particular
• admitting items seized pursuant to valid portions of warrant, other portions of which were insufficiently particular
• “We recognize the danger that warrants might be obtained which are essentially general in character but as to minor items meet the requirements of particularity. ... Such an abuse of the warrant procedure, of course, could not be tolerated.”
• widely acknowledged as the leading state case adopting the doctrine of severability
• “W e recognize the danger that warrants might be obtained which are essentially general in character but as to minor items meet the requirements of particularity . . . . Such an abuse of the warrant procedure, of course, could not be tolerated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).