Skip to main content

Friedman v. Friedman

Citations

  • 384 S.E.2d 641
  • 259 Ga. 530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fixing the date of the divorce as the terminus ad quern for the accretion of marital property
  • document properly excluded as demonstrative evidence where witness admits that she testified as shown by the transcripts of prior depositions and prior hearing
  • phrases must be read in context with surrounding language, and each provision should be read to harmonize with others if possible
  • cross-appeal may expand issues on appeal following grant of interlocutory review
  • overruled in part by Duckworth v. State, 492 S.E.2d 201 (Ga. 1997), holding that prior inconsistent statements are admissible, regardless as to whether the witness admits that he or she made the pre-trial statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.