Friedl v. City Of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requirements similar to those set forth in Morrissey “would logically apply to revocation of work release”
• holding that requirements similar to those set forth in Morrissey \would logically apply to revocation of work release\
• holding that a district court must exclude additional material outside are presented in response to a 12(b)(6) motion or convert the motion to one for summary judgment
• holding that amendment was appropriate \based on information acquired during depositions and other discovery\
• finding that plaintiffs allegations are sufficiently specific to state claim and listing the various allegations
• noting that a retaliation claim may not be stated in conclusory terms, but instead must be supported by specific factual allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).